A toothless argument
Writing for the Guardian, Peter Preston chastises what he deems to be a “rigid, embattled nation” for allowing the “success” of the anti-fluoridation lobby. He urges readers not to get “bogged down” by scientific “tit for tat” and acknowledge that “350 million or more” people around the globe are drinking fluoridated water and meanwhile “show no evident sign of debility as a result (bar a little occasional staining) and enjoy markedly less dental decay.” He suggests that dissidents are simply more pro-active in pursuing their argument and calls for a greater challenge from “the dozily reasonable who know that fluoridation is a good thing for their kids.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/09/fluoridation-southampton-water-politics
Look who’s smiling
Also writing for the Guardian, and following last week’s media coverage of dental earnings and salaries, Emine Saner provides a detailed analysis of “the commercialisation of teeth” exploring the evolution of both NHS dental care and patient needs, as well as the nature of dentistry as a business.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/aug/08/dentists-earnings-nhs-private-practice
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/aug/08/commercialisation-teeth-dentist-income
Marcus "I am completly in favour of fluoridation of the drinking water in the UK. We only need one part to one million parts water to dramatically reduce tooth decay"
" I am a reader of the Guardian newspaper and the articles above on link are not especially kind to dentists - you must make up your own mind. It discusses how much money some dentists earn. Take it with a pinch of salt; the way I look at it is that if I was going for a private operation on my eyes, for instance, I would want my eye surgeon happy and well rewarded!"
Recent Comments